One
of the first collections that I processed at the Richardson Center was the
transcription of letters and materials either signed by Sam Houston or sent to
him. The letters date from 1826 to
1860 spanning the time when Houston served as a United States Senator from
Tennessee, through his tenure as president of the Republic of Texas, and later official
documents during his time as governor of Texas. Some of the letters written during his second term as
president of the Republic of Texas deal with the printing of currency to fund
the republic. Other letters focus
on personal matters. Transcription
was necessary because the ink is fading on many of the documents. In addition, handwritten materials are
difficult or impossible to word search.
So far OCR (Optical Recognition) software to accurately perform that
task is just not all that good.
Apparently schools are no longer teaching cursive writing so future
generations will have to rely on transcriptions to read these types of letters. Seems like a loss to me, but no one
asked my opinion.
For
archivists or at least this archivist the history or provenance of these
letters and papers is particularly interesting. They point to problems facing archivists dealing with old
papers and highlight the need to maintain the integrity of a collection. Remember one of my first posts in which
I listed the two most important principles of archival processing: provenance
and original order. Both concepts
are missing in the Houston papers.
In all likelihood the Houston papers were originally part of the R. C.
Crane collection at the Center.
Crane was a Sweetwater, Texas, attorney with a long term interest in
Texas history. He was one of the
founders of the West Texas Historical Association and served as president for
many years. He was also a paper
collector. At one time all of his
personal papers were at Hardin-Simmons, but these papers were transferred to
the Southwest Collection at Texas Tech University several years ago. Some of the antique papers
amassed by Crane were kept at Hardin-Simmons. These papers include Civil War documents among other things. None of these antique documents have been
processed. The Houston papers have
handwritten prices in one corner indicating that they were sold. In all likelihood they were separated
from the Crane documents because of the importance of the Houston
signature. (Although I have been
told that Houston was a prolific writer and his signature is on many, many
documents decreasing their value I suppose. Still it is Sam Houston.) Any other information regarding the origin of the papers may
be in the Crane personal papers at the Southwest Collection. To my knowledge these have not yet been
processed.
The
moral of this story is that collections should be kept together. Knowing where papers are from, their
history or provenance not only authenticates the document, but also provides a
complete story more interesting than just a famous signature.
what does it say?
ReplyDelete