So
you want to give your family papers to an archive. What do you need to do? Usually it’s best to contact an
archive before you are ready to put everything in a dumpster so they can
determine if it is an appropriate collection for them. I suspect that most
people don’t know that archives and museums have mission statements that define
the focus of the collecting activities of the institution. Further, they have specific collecting
policies that dictate what they will not only accept, but actively solicit. Ideally archivists do what is called
appraisals before accepting collections. The term means in part making a
determination as to the importance and relevance of a collection for the
mission of their particular archive. That determination is totally unrelated to
monetary value. Determination of
possible monetary value, especially for income tax purposes, (As you know,
donors can receive income tax deductions for some donations) is the job of a
certified paper appraiser not an archivist. I can make an educated guess as to research potential of a
collection, gauge public interest, and the appropriateness of a collection for
a specific institution, but monetary value – no idea and really very little
interest.
If you want to donate Aunt Matilda’s
papers, you need to find an archive that might be interested in her letters and
things. One resource is the local institutions. They can steer you to the most appropriate facility. For example, if Aunt Matilda was an
army nurse during Vietnam maybe the Southwest Collection at Texas Tech is the
best repository for her papers. They actively solicit papers related to the
Vietnam era as well as those related to ranching in West Texas. Hardin-Simmons accepts papers related
to the history and people of the region around Abilene. Abilene Christian University is
interested in papers related to the Restoration Movement and Churches of Christ. You get the idea.
Next question is what do you save
if you are charged with cleaning out Aunt Matilda’s attic? It’ s hard to throw
things away. (Although some people do it way too easily and important
information can be lost.) I’ve worked on quite a few collections salvaged from
the dumpster. Back to what to save
and what to throw away. Some
decisions are hard. Others are easy. Consider all those National Geographic magazines. The pictures are so wonderful and the
information so interesting that you or Aunt Matilda saved them for years. But so does everybody else including
the National Geographic Society itself.
The Society has even published a CD called the “Complete National
Geographic” which has all of the print editions of the magazines since it’s
inception in 1888. So it’s ok to
re-cycle yours at the recycling center.
Don’t give it to a library or archives because archivists and librarians
can’t be hoarders either. There’s
not enough space or money to preserve all of the paper we have produced even if
you just count that from the United States. Examples of what archives generally
don’t hoard – more than two or three duplicates; published material available
elsewhere; moldy crumbling paper (they might make copies of it if the
information is worth it); books that aren’t rare or first editions;
perhaps some individual financial material or medical information that raises
privacy issues might not belong in an archive. What is important
for an archive to preserve is primary documentation. That means papers, like letters or notes that have not been
published elsewhere. Of course,
every collection is different. Ask
your local archivist or librarian.
They can help.
No comments:
Post a Comment